Tuesday, May 28, 2019
Against Capital Punishment Essay -- essays research papers
At 800 p.m. it was nearing the completion of John Evans last day on death row. He had spent most of the day with his curate and family, praying and talking of what was to come. At 820 he was walked from his cell down to the long hall to the execution room and slashped in the electric chair. At 830 p.m. the first jolt of 1900 volts passed through with(predicate) Mr. Evans body. It lasted 30 seconds. Sparks and flames erupted from the electrode tied to Mr. Evans leg. His body slammed against the straps holding him in the chair and his fist clenched permanently. The electrode then burst from the strap holding it in place. A large puff of gray smoke and sparks pored out from under the hood that covered his face. An overpowering stench of burnt conformation and clothing began pervading the witness room. Two doctors then examined Mr. Evans and decl ared that he was not dead.The electrode was then refastened and Mr. Evans was given another 30-second jolt. The stench was nauseating. Ag ain the doctors examined him and found his heart silence beating. At this time the prison commissioner, who was talking on the line with Governor George Wallace of Alabama, was asked to cancel the execution on the grounds that Mr. Evans was being subject to cruel and extraordinary punishment. The request was denied.At 840 p.m. the third charge of electricity was passed through Mr. Evans body. At 844 p.m. he was pronounced dead. The execution took 14 minutes. Afterward officials were embarrassed by what one observer called the barbaric ritual. The electric chair is supposed to be a very humane way of administering death, if on that point is one (Zimring, & Hawkins, 1986, p.1).Every Western Industrial nation has stopped executing criminals, except the United States. Most Western nations have executed criminals in this century, and some(prenominal) were executed after World War II. Then executions suddenly decreased (Clay, 1990, p.9). This is partly because the people in many Europ ean countries might have been trite of killing from the war. In most cases the countries and states that stopped crown punishment followed with its formal abolition shortly after (Clay, 1990, p.10). One reason that the United States did not end capital punishment at this time is partly due to the fact that the war was never fought on our soil and US citizens had not all lived through the death and destruction of WWII personally. Some think that ... ...yclists from Los Angeles who were innocent. The jurys verdict in this case was based on alleged eyewitnesses and a perjured testimony. If it hadnt been for the investigation of newspaper journalists, and the confession of the real killer, they too would have died innocent men (Bedau, 1999, November 10).Though these two stories have reassuring endings, but the chances of good outcomes happening are small. bulk are too commonly wrongly accused of crimes. There entrust always be overzealous prosecution, perjured testimony, faulty pol ice work, coerced confessions, the defendants previous criminal record, and inept defense councils. People will be wrongly put to death leaving their families behind wondering who was telling the truth. As long as society chooses to ignore its moral values, and as long as it brings down the value of a human life, capital punishment will remain in use. People must do the research and see for themselves the costs to society, both in dollars and in lives, are far too high. People will always make mistakes, and with the death penalty in use innocent people will die. For these reasons the United States should follow the lead and abolish capital punishment.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.